Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3729 (AP)

G.Musali Naidu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal

WP/24838/2016 · 2025-06-19

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 24838 OF 201 fi AMARAVATI Between: G.Musali Naidu, s/o Krishna Murthy Naidu, aged about 58 years Accountant, P.A.C.S. Ravivalasa District. occ: Gagugubilli Mandalam Vizianagaram ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, . '^eP- by its Principal, Secretary, Agriculture and Co-operation (Coop.lll) Department Hyderabad. Secretariat, 2. The Commissioner for Co-operation and Registrar Societies, A.P., Hyderabad. 3. The District Co-operative Officer, Vizianagaram District, 4. The Divisional Co-operative Officer, District. 5. Ravivalasa Primary Agricultural Co-op. Society, Rep. by its Chief Executive officer, Ravivalasa Village, Garugubilli Vizianagaram. of Co-operative Vizianagaram. Parvathipuram, Vizianagaram Mandalam, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the impugned Order dt. 23-06-2016 informing that the petitioner will be retired from service on 30-07-2016 without following Act 4 of 2014 issued by the Government of Andhra Pradesh as arbitrary, illegal and against the principals of natural justice and consequently set aside the same. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016fWPMP. NO: 30667 OF ?nifi) Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders directing the respondents continue the petitioner as Accountant upto the suspending the impugned order dt.23.06.2016 issued by the 5th herein, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P L RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI Y SUDHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following: ORDER herein to age of 60 years, by respondent % APHC010021542016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 24838/2016 Between: G. Musali Naidu ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by Its Principal and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P L RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) 2.Y SUDHAKAR The Court made the following ORDER: At the time of hearing the writ petition, it is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in view of the subsequent events taken place in the lis, the cause in the writ petition does not survive. 2. Learned Standing Counsel for the 5'^ respondent and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Cooperation conceded with the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. Recording the above said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as No costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand infructuous. closed. Sd /- B. CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// L. To, 1. One CC to Sri P L Rao Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri Y Sudhakar Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to GP for Cooperation. High Court of Andhra 4. Three CD Copies Pradesh. [OUT] TF HIGH COURT DATED:20/06/2025 ORDER WP.No.24838 of 2016 'i|. 0 9 SEP 2025 S‘ DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS