[2025:RJ-JP:41772] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14712/2025 Rajkumari W/o Veerendra Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village And Post Kachrauli, Tehsil Hindaun City, District Karauli, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Women And Child Development Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Women And Child Development Department, 2, Jal Path, Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur. 3. Deputy Director, Women And Child Development Department, Karauli. 4. The Additional District Collector, Hindaun City District Karauli. 5. The Child Development Project Officer, Panchayat Samiti Hindaun City, District Karauli, Rajasthan. 6. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Hindaun City, District Karauli, Rajasthan. 7. The Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Kachrauli, Tehsil Hindaun City, District Karauli, Rajasthan. 8. Ruksana Bano W/o Barkat Khan, R/o Gram Panchayat Nisura, Tehsil Todabheem District Karauli, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 13/10/2025 1. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- [2025:RJ-JP:41772] (2 of 3) [CW-14712/2025] “i. Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the impugned Gram Sabha Proceeding dated 26.12.2024 (Anx.7) be quashed and set aside and the respondents may kindly be directed to give appointment to the petitioner on the post of Anganwari Helper at Aanganbari Centre Sanki Ka Pura, Gram Panchayat Kachrauli, Tehsil Hindaun City District Karauli with all consequential benefits as she stood at Merit No.1 ii Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondents be directed to comply the guidelines and thereby consider the petitioner for appointment on the post of Anganwari Helper. iii Pass any other appropriate order which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioner.” 2. During course of arguments learned counsel for the petitioner submits that several representations were filed to the respondents but none of them was decided by the respondents despite repeated persuasion by the petitioner. He submits that the respondents be directed to decide her representation and an additional opportunity be granted to file fresh representation with legal position and respondents be directed to decide the representation, in a time bound manner. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondent No.2 within a period of 15 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed [2025:RJ-JP:41772] (3 of 3) [CW-14712/2025] post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/21