Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3728 (UTT)

PANDIT PURBHAJIRAO SAWANT v. UNION OF INDIA

WPSB/120/2021 · 2025-05-01

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Vivek Bharti Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSB/120/2021 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Vivek Bharti Sharma, J. (Per: Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 1. Ms. H. Gupta, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Yogesh Pant, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Ramji Srivastava, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 to 4. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement at the bar that the relief, as claimed in the writ petition, do not survive and the writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time. 4. In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed, as infructuous. (Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 01.05.2025 Aswal NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f980 2a3a08b08d1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C 22DACF4F4610C1FE58A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2025.05.01 13:48:31 -07'00'