Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37278 (AP)

Dasara Papeswara Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLRC/2323/2018 · 2025-07-02

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

\ w' APHC010631332018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2323 OF 2018 Between: Dasara Papeswara Rao, S/o.Gopala Krishna Murthy, aged about 59 years, R/o.D.No.49-54-6/14/1, Sri Sai Raj Sadan, Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam. ...PETITIONER/COMPLAINANT AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. ...RESPONDENT Gatti Venkata Ramana Murthy, S/o.Venkata Atchuta Rama Krishnaiah, aged about 52 years, R/o.D.No.45-47-14/3, Narasimha Nagar, Visakhapatnam. ...RESPONDENT/ACCUSED Revision filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.PC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the Order, dated 16-06-2018 passed in Crl.M.P.No.2125 of 2018 in C.C.No.7 of 2017, of the file of the Court of the Special Magistrate-Ill, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI SRINIVASA RAO BODDULURI Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : MS.M.S.V.S.SUDHA RANI The Court made the following ORDER : / APHC010631332018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2323/2018 Between: DASARA PAPESWARA RAO, R/O.D.NO.49-54-6/14/1, SRI SAI RAJ SADAN, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD. 2.GATTI VENKATA RAMANA MURTHY, R/O.D.NO.45-47-14/3, NARASIMHA NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: SRINIVASA RAO BODDULURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.MSVS SUDHARANI 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the become infructuous as the main the learned Special Magistrate-Ill, Visakhapatnam on 21.06.2023. matter has case i.e., C.C. No.7 of 2017 on the file of , was ended in acquittal 2. In view of the disposal of the main case itself, nothing remains in this Criminal Revision Case for further adjudication. 3. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. SDI- M.RAMESH BABU DEPUTY R^gSTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The III Special Magistrate, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 2. One CC to Sri Srinivasa Rao Bodduluri, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Ms. MSVS Sudha Rani, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CC's to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati [OUT] 5. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi 6. Three CD Copies BSV TAC HIGH COURT DATED:03/07/2025 ORDER CRLRC NO. 2323 OF 2018 of- AMDh’i 'it’s- < i'3 'ii i'-' '=3.1 (■L 2 5 SEP 2025 mi lld> ii DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS