Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
\ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE AT AMARAVATI ?0 o « ^ PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 6685 OF 2n9.‘^ . if--' Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt that in the circumstances stated i of Courts Act 1971 praying in the affidavit file herein, the High Court pleased to punish the Respondents herein may be for their willful disobedience of the
order made by this Court in W.P.No.32q80 of 2022 dated 20-07-2023. Between: Thatiparthi Eswar Reddy, S/o. Late Sri Chenchu Reddy Hindu, Age 74 Agriculture R/o. Empedu - 517 620, Srikalahasti Mandal Tirupati District years, Occ i ■! ' ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. Sri KBhaskar, S/o No. known to the petitioner, Panchaya, Secretary, Grama anc ayat, Empedu - 517 620, Srikalahasti Mandal, Tirupati District. 5T7 620's rr" - 517 620, Srikalahasti Mandal, Tirupati District. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. N SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: G VENKATA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following: ORDER SRI G MAHESH
r APHC010631782023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY .THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 6685/2023 ■v. Between: Thatiparthi Eswar Reddy ...PETITIONER AND Sri N Bhaskar and Others ...CONTEMNOR(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.N SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1.GANDAVALLI MAHESH
2. G VENKATA REDDY The Court made the following:
ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act. 1971. for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 20.07.2023 passed in W.P.No.32080 of 2022.
2. Sri K.Srinivasa Rao. learned counsel representing Sri N.Siva Reddy,
learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the orders of this Court, disobedience of which is complained of in this Contempt Case has been complied with and prayed to close the contempt.
3. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// To, SECTION OFFICER
3. One CC to SRI. N SIVA REDDY Advocate [OPUC]
4. One CC to SRI. G VENKATA REDDY Advocate
5. One CC to Sri G Mahesh, Advocate [OPUC] [OPUC],
6. Two CD Copies Pmg AL \
r HIGH COURT DATED:08/05/2025 \ \
ORDER CC.No.6685 of 2023 gT 0 J AUG 2025 m Co’ CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE