HANUMAN SAHAI SHARMA S/O LATE SHRI RUGNATH SHARMA v. RELIANCE COMMUNICATION INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.
ARBAP/33/2024 · 2025-11-14
Maneesh Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37272 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37272 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:46035] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Arbitration Application No. 33/2024 Hanuman Sahai Sharma S/o Late Shri Rugnath Sharma, R/o Nayala, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur. (Raj.) ----Applicant Versus
1. Reliance Communication Infrastructure Ltd., E-170, VKIA Road No. 12, Jaipur Through Its Infra Lead (Manager)
2. Reliance Communication/Telecom Ltd., 1st Floor, H-Block, Dhiru Bhai Ambani Knowlegde City, Navi Mumbai-400710 Through Its Managing Director ----Respondents For Applicant(s) : Ms. Apoorwa Agarwal, Mr. Avinash Bhardwaj on behalf of Mr. Himanshu Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishabh Khandelwal on behalf of Mr. Ravindra Pal Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Order 14/11/2025
1. The present arbitration application has been filed by the applicant under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of a sole arbitrator under the agreement dated 01.01.2008 executed between the parties.
2. During the course of arguments, on the disclosure made by
learned counsel for the respondents that, in view of the initiation of proceedings for preparation of a resolution plan, the applicant may submit his claim therein.
3. Further, learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present Arbitration Application at this stage, with liberty to file an appropriate application for satisfaction of his claim
[2025:RJ-JP:46035] (2 of 2) [ARBAP-33/2024] in the resolution proceedings pending before the concerned Resolution Professional, Mr. Anish Niranjan Nanavaty, appointed by the NCLT vide order dated 21.06.2019.
4. Taking into consideration the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, permission as prayed for is granted.
5. Accordingly, the present Arbitration Application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
6. However, the applicant shall be at liberty to seek revival of the application in case the eventuality so arises.
7. The stay application as well as other pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/110