ADITYA KUMAR PATHAK ALLIAS ADITYA KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./10955/2025 · 2025-12-19
Ambuj Nath
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37267 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37267 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:38206 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B. A. No. 10955 of 2025
Aditya Kumar Pathak @ Aditya Kumar, aged about 21 years, son of Ramdev Pathak, resident of H. No. 213, Mahanand Basti, Jemco, P.O. & P.S.- Telco, Town- Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum.
…. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
…. Opp. Party
------ CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH
------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Girish Mohan Singh, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, A.P.P.
----- 3/ 19.12.2025 Heard the parties.
2.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. No. 132 of 2025 arising out of Telco P.S. Case No. 112 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. No. 1213 of 2024, for the offence registered under Sections 126, 115(1), 117(2), 109(1), 74, 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S., and charge-sheet has been submitted for the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 74, 75(3), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., pending in the Cout of Addl. Sessions Judge-VII-cum-Special Judge (CAW), Jamshedpur.
3.
Bail applications of this petitioner were earlier twice rejected by this Court vide B.A. No. 371 of 2025 and B.A. No. 5322 of 2025.
4.
Petitioner kept his evil eye on the informant. On the date of occurrence, he assaulted the husband of the informant by a cricket bat, due to which, he sustained grievous injuries. It is also alleged that when the informant came to the rescue of her husband, petitioner also molested her.
5.
A report regarding the stage of trial, earlier called for, has been received. It appears that trial is under progress and the same is likely to be concluded within three months.
6.
Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to release the petitioner, on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected at this stage.
7.
Learned Trial Court shall expedite the trial and conclude the same, preferably within three months, from the next date fixed for recording of evidence, failing which, the petitioner, if so advised, may renew his prayer for bail.
(Ambuj Nath, J.) R.Kr. 19.12.2025 / Uploaded on 20.12.2025