Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37264 (PNJ)

ANKIT VERMA AND OTHERS v. MRS ANADITA MITTRA AND ANOTHER

COCP/1480/2025 · 2025-04-02

Harkesh Manuja

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

170/10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ANKIT VERMA MRS ANADITA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Mr. Shreesh Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. HARKESH MANUJA, Learned State counsel on instructions from Head of the Department submits that the petitioners shall be released their benefits under orders passed by the Writ Court which was upheld in an intra appeal; within two months from today. He also submits that wherever an employee was recruited prior to 17.07.2020, he shall be accorded benefits in terms of notification dated 05.07.2021 with In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the present petition, however it is made clear that in case the respondents fail to do the needful in terms of aforesaid undertaking, the salary of both the made. Rule discharged. Keeping in view the undertaking extended by the respondents, the payment of cost is deferred and in case the aforesaid undertaking is not complied with, the order dated 06 imposing cost(s) of Rs.5,000/ automatically stand revived. 02.04.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: ANKIT VERMA AND ORS Versus MRS ANADITA MITTRA AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Kapil Kakkar, Advocate and Mr. Shreesh Kakkar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel on instructions from Head of the Department submits that the petitioners shall be released their benefits ders passed by the Writ Court which was upheld in an intra appeal; within two months from today. He also submits that wherever an employee was recruited prior to 17.07.2020, he shall be accorded benefits in terms of notification dated 05.07.2021 with In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the present petition, however it is made clear that in case the respondents fail to do the needful in terms of aforesaid undertaking, the both the respondents shall remain attached till the compliance is Rule discharged. Keeping in view the undertaking extended by the respondents, the payment of cost is deferred and in case the aforesaid undertaking is not complied with, the order dated 06.03.2025 passed by this Court imposing cost(s) of Rs.5,000/- to be paid to each of the petitioners shall automatically stand revived. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1480-2025 Date of Decision: April 02, 2025 .......Petitioners .......Respondents HARKESH MANUJA for the petitioners. Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Addl. A.G. Punjab. Learned State counsel on instructions from Head of the Department submits that the petitioners shall be released their benefits ders passed by the Writ Court which was upheld in an intra-Court appeal; within two months from today. He also submits that wherever an employee was recruited prior to 17.07.2020, he shall be accorded benefits in terms of notification dated 05.07.2021 within the afore-stated period. In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the present petition, however it is made clear that in case the respondents fail to do the needful in terms of aforesaid undertaking, the shall remain attached till the compliance is Keeping in view the undertaking extended by the respondents, the payment of cost is deferred and in case the aforesaid undertaking is .03.2025 passed by this Court to be paid to each of the petitioners shall (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 2025 April 02, 2025 Learned State counsel on instructions from Head of the Department submits that the petitioners shall be released their benefits Court appeal; within two months from today. He also submits that wherever an employee was recruited prior to 17.07.2020, he shall be accorded benefits In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the present petition, however it is made clear that in case the respondents fail to do the needful in terms of aforesaid undertaking, the shall remain attached till the compliance is Keeping in view the undertaking extended by the respondents, the payment of cost is deferred and in case the aforesaid undertaking is .03.2025 passed by this Court to be paid to each of the petitioners shall TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.04.04 15:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document