Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37263 (PNJ)

DHANUSH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/2833/2025 · 2025-03-21

Manisha Batra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 137 DHANUSH AND ANOTHER STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Mr Advocate for Mr. Arun Kumar Singla, A.A.G., Haryana MANISHA BATRA 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing official respondents at the hands of respondent dated 19.03.2025 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner 19.03.2025 before the their grievances as been considered and no action has that at this stage, the issued to respondent No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No. Date of decision: 21.03.2025 DHANUSH AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate for Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Arun Kumar Singla, A.A.G., Haryana **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondents No. 4 to 7 and to take action on dated 19.03.2025 (Annexure P-5). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on before the Commissioner of Police, grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions are respondent No. 2- Commissioner of Police, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH No.2833 of 2025 Date of decision: 21.03.2025 …. Petitioner Versus …. Respondents MANISHA BATRA , Advocate for Mr. Mohan Singh Rana, Mr. Arun Kumar Singla, A.A.G., Haryana. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners take action on their representation At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has recently filed a representation on of Police, Hisar (Annexure P-5) raising petition but the same has not yet been taken thereon. He further submitted satisfied if appropriate directions are of Police, Hisar to decide the of the the s their representation has recently filed a representation on raising petition but the same has not yet further submitted satisfied if appropriate directions are decide the Jyoti 2025.03.24 10:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP No.2833 of 2025 aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner thereon. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Arun Kumar Singla, A.A.G., Haryana Court, has accepted the notice on behalf of the res that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to him during the course of the day. 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the meri of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide representation period of 15 days law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the respondents would provide and liberty. 21.03.2025 Jyoti-IV CRWP No.2833 of 2025 aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner Notice of motion. Mr. Arun Kumar Singla, A.A.G., Haryana accepted the notice on behalf of the res the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to him during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide dated 19.03.2025 (Annexure P 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No CRWP No.2833 of 2025 -2- aforesaid representation filed by the petitioners and take necessary action Mr. Arun Kumar Singla, A.A.G., Haryana who is present in accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to him during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without ts of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid Annexure P-5) of the petitioners within a from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official them adequate security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No necessary action who is present in State and submits the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the , without disposed the aforesaid within a accordance with , the official them adequate security in order to protect their life Jyoti 2025.03.24 10:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document