HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8753/2024 Ramesh Nitharwal Son Of Banwari Nitharwal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Ghasi Jat Ki Dhani, Bagru, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Gopal Lal Jat Son Of Sohan Lal Jat, R/o Sohan Jat Ki Dhani, Bagru, Tehsil Sanganer, Districtjaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jiya Ur Rahman For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Gupta-PP Mr. Tribhuwan Prasad Pandey JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 06/11/2025 Counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant disputed the factum of compromise. Counsel submits that complainant has refused to sign the compromise and infact no compromise has taken place in the present matter. Counsel further submits that the fact of compromise, as alleged in the petition, has been seriously disputed by the complainant by way of filing a misc. application on record. Considering the above statement of the counsel for the complainant so also the application filed by the complainant disputing the compromise, the instant criminal misc. petition, based on the compromise alleged to have taken place between the parties, cannot be entertained and the same is hereby dismissed. (2 of 2) [CRLMP-8753/2024] The present criminal misc. petition, stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/138