APHC010631962023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3276/2023 Between: 1. PASUMARTHI BULLEMMA (DIED), D 2. PASUMARTHI YEDUKONDALU,, S/O LATE APPARAO, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O THADUVAL VILLAGE, JANGAREDDYGUDEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI (ELURU) DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. GADDE VARA LAKSHMI, W/O NAGESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC- HOUSE WIFE, R/O NARAMVARIGUDEM VILLAGE, ASWARAOPET MANDAL, BADARDRI KOTHAGUDEM DISTRICT 2. KANURI RANI, W/O NARAYANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC- HOUSE WIFE, R/O POTHINEEDHIPALEM VILLAGE, NALLAJERLA MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 3. YELLINA VENKATESWARARAO, , S/O BRAHMAYYA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC-CULTIVATION, R/O 100, RAMAIMAPALEM, T. NARSAPURAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI (ELURU) DISTRICT (RESPONDENT NO. 3 IS NOT NECESSARY PARTY IN PRESENT CRP) ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to allow the CRP by setting aside the order dated 18-10-2023 passed VS,J CRP No.3276 of 2023 2 in IA.no.325 of 2018 in ATC 1 of 2017 before special officer Tenancy Tribunal (AA) Cum- Junior Civil judge Cum Judicial Magistrate of First Class Chintalapudi in the interest of justice and equity and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in ATC 1 of 2017 pending before Hon’ble Special Officer Tenancy Tribunal (Aa) Cum Junior Civil Judge Cum Judicial Magistrate Of First Class: Chintalapudi, pending final disposal of this CRP in the interest of justice and equity and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. VUYYURU LAKSHMANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M R K CHAKRAVARTHY VS,J CRP No.3276 of 2023 3 The Court made the following Order: When the matter is taken up today, in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties, learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission of this Court to withdraw this Civil Revision Petition and a memo dated 23.09.2025 is filed to that effect. 2. Permission is accorded and the said memo is taken on record. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, in this Civil Revision Petition, shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date:26.09.2025 Ksj