[2025:RJ-JP:27259] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10870/2025 Panchuram Sagar S/o Shri Baluram Sagar, Aged About 66 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 8, Shanti Nagar-B, Near Shiv Temple, Gurjar Ki Thadi, Jaipur 302019 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Chief Secretary, Secretariat, C-Scheme, Jaipur 2. Jaipur Development Authority, Through Its Commissioner, Jln Marg, Jaipur. 3. Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Grater, Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Bhavan, Tonk Road, Jaipur. 4. Deputy Commissioner, Mansarovar Zone, Nagar Nigam Grater, Mansarovar, Jaipur. 5. Deputy Commissioner (Vigilance), Nagar Nigam, Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Bhavan, Tonk Road, Jaipur. 6. Pannalal Jailthuriya S/o Tarachand Jailthuriya, Plot No. 7, Shanti Nagar-B, Near Shiv Temple, Gurjar Ki Thadi, Jaipur 302019 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yogesh Kumar Tailor For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 22/07/2025 1. A limited prayer has been made by the counsel for the petitioner for issuing a direction to the respondents authority to decide the representation submitted by the petitioner expeditiously within a time frame. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a detailed comprehensive representation has been submitted by the [2025:RJ-JP:27259] (2 of 2) [CW-10870/2025] petitioner before the authorities concerned on 12.07.2025 but no heed has been paid. 3. Considering the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition stands disposed of with expectation from the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner (pending if any), expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order. 4. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. 5. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any order or direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner in a particular way, the respondents would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/16