Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37251 (BOM)

KAILASNATH @ RAJU ASHOK EKKE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

APEAL/247/2020 · 2025-07-21

Shri Shivkumar Dige

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

81-APEAL-247-2020.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.247 OF 2020 Kailasnath @ Raju Ashok Ekke …. Appellant V/s. The State Of Maharashtra And Anr …. Respondents ---- Mr.Hriday Surve h/f Mr.Ranjeet Pawar, for the Appellant. Ms.Dhanalxmi Krishna Iyyer, APP, for Respondent-State. ---- CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 21st JULY 2025 P.C:- . By this Appeal, the Appellant is seeking regular bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Appellant and learned APP. 3. The learned counsel for the Appellant submit that, he has returned the papers of the Appeal to the Appellant. 4. The learned APP submit that, the Appellant has undergone the sentence imposed on him. She has produced copy of the order passed by the Trial Court on record. It is taken on record and marked ‘x’ for identification. N.S. Kamble page 1 of 2 NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE Digitally signed by NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE Date: 2025.07.23 15:06:07 +0530 81-APEAL-247-2020.doc 5. Considering the submissions of learned APP, the Appellant has undergone sentence imposed on him, hence, this Appeal has become infructuous. Hence, dismissed as infructuous. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) N.S. Kamble page 2 of 2