Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3725 (AP)

J.V. RAMANA RAO v. UNION OF INDIA

WP/1201/2018 · 2025-06-24

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010021572018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 1201/2018 Between: 1. J.V. RAMANA RAO, S/O LATE J YERRAIAH, AGED 45 YEARS, BILLING CLERK, D.NO.38-38-80,RCT COLONY, MARRIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 2. M.ESWARA RAO, S/O MKN TIKKANNA, BILLING CLERK, R/O SIVANAGAR, MARRIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. LAKKU RAMU, S/O LATE RAJU, AGED 38 YEARS, ACCOUNTANT, H.NO.57-11-9/2, SUBHASH NAGAR, URVASI JN. KANCHARAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM - 8. 4. G.ANIL KUMAR, S/O SURYANARAYANA, AGED 22 YEARS, HELPER, R/O 7-355/1, VENKATA SAI NAGAR, NAIDU THOTA, VEPAGUNTA, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, NEW DELHI 2. CHEIF OF NAVAL STAFF, NAVY HEADQUARTERS, NEW DELHI. 3. FLAG OFFICER COMMANDINGINCHIEF, EASTERN NAVAL COMMAND, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2 4. COMMANDING OFFICER, INS CIRCARS, VISAKHAPATNAM - 14. 5. THE OFFICERINCHARGE, FAIR DEAL CANTEEN I, C/O ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE, SVN COLONY, 104 AREA, MARRIPALEM POST, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the proceedings No. No.103/2FDC1/104A, dated 16/8/2017 of the 4th respondent as arbitrary, illegal, void-ab-initio and violative of Sec.25F of the ID act and that the petitioners are deemed to be in service with all consequential and attendant benefits and further direct the respondents to regularize their services and pass such other order or orders. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioners by suspending the impugned proceedings No.103/2/FDC1/104A, dated 16/8/2017 pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. A V S LAXMI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. B JITHENDER (SC FOR CENTRAL GOVT. COUNSEL) The Court made the following: ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that in the light of the interim orders passed by this Court, except one person, all the petitioners are continuing in their employment. Learned counsel would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 3 2. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 25.06.2025 ARR 4 246 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 1201/2018 Dt.25.06.2025 ARR