[2025:RJ-JP:44324] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16588/2025 Sanjeev Kumar S/o Surendra Kumar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Vill. - Majari Kalan, Teh. - Neemrana, District Kotputli Behror, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan Police, Police Headquarters, Lalkothi, Jaipur. 3. Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Its Secretary, Ghooghara Ghati, Jaipur Road, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Chechi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG with Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma Mr. MF Baig for RPSC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 03/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer:- “Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer to extend the benefit of age relaxation in accordance with the recommendations of the Committee of Ministers as accepted by the State Government, and consequently allow the petitioners to submit their online application forms pursuant to the advertisement dated 17.07.2025. [2025:RJ-JP:44324] (2 of 4) [CW-16588/2025] 2. Quash and set aside the advertisement dated 17.07.2025 (Annexure-2) to the limited extent it does not provide for age relaxation to unsuccessful candidates of the recruitment process of 2021, and further direct the respondent to suitably amend the advertisement by incorporating the said relaxation. 3. Direct the Respondents, particularly the Rajasthan Public Service Commission, to accept the Petitioner's candidature and permit him to participate in the recruitment process of 2025 for the post of Sub-Inspector, Rajasthan Police, after granting age relaxation as recommended by the Cabinet Committee vide its decision dated 28.06.2025; 4. Further direct the Respondents to extend the same benefit of age relaxation to all similarly placed candidates who had participated in the 2021 recruitment process but were rendered ineligible solely due to age; 5. Issue any other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. 6. Award costs of the writ petition in favour of the petitioners.” 2. Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 whereas Mr. M.F. Baig accepts notice on respondent No.3. 3. Learned counsel for parties submits that this writ petition be disposed of in light of judgment dated 30.10.2025 in SB [2025:RJ-JP:44324] (3 of 4) [CW-16588/2025] CWP No.16031/2025 titled as Surajmal and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner has already applied in pursuant to Advertisement dated 17.07.2025 and he is entitled for permission to appear in the examination. 5. Learned counsel for RPSC submits that similarly placed candidates were also allowed to appear in the examination, therefore if an application has been submitted online in pursuant to advt. dated 17.07.2025 then the petitioner may be permitted to appear in the said examination. 6. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for parties and also taking note of disposal of case of Surajmal and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) instant writ petition be disposed of in same terms and in following manner: (i) The respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are directed to consider relaxation of age to the petitioner, if he appeared in public examination for recruitment of Sub-Inspectors in pursuant to advertisement dated 03.02.2021 issued by the RPSC, Ajmer and has re-applied in pursuant to advertisement dated 17.07.2025 issued by RPSC for the post of Sub Inspectors and Platoon Commander (RAC), so that he may not be debarred on ground of attaining maximum permissible age; (ii) The State Government is directed to consider the suggestions as mentioned in case of Surajmal and Ors. (supra) and take a decision within eight weeks from date of [2025:RJ-JP:44324] (4 of 4) [CW-16588/2025] receipt of copy of the order, regarding relaxation of age to the petitioner. (iii) The RPSC will permit the petitioner, if he has filed an application in pursuant to advt. Dated 17.07.2025, to appear in the said examination to be held in pursuant to advt. dated 17.07.2025. (iv) The RPSC is directed to declare the result of the petitioner after said examination in pursuant to permission granted to him. (v) If petitioner is successful in written examination and still he is aggrieved from the decision of the Government regarding relaxation in age then he will have a right to re- approach this Court by filing a fresh writ petition. (vi) At this stage the legal issue regarding relaxation of age is kept open. 7. Accordingly, writ petition along with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/19