APHC010627302014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 17663/2014 Between: 1. KASIREDDY SUBRAMANYAM REDDY,, PARTNER OF M/S SAI BALAJI CONSTRUCTIONS, MALLEMVARIPALLI VILLAGE, PULLAMPET MANDAL, CUDDAPAH DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY, IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETRIATE BUILDINGS OF A.P., HYDERABAD. 2. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KURNOOL RURAL CIRCLE KURNOOL DIST, - 3. THE BRANCH MANAGER, STATE BANK OF HYDERABAD,GOPAL REDDY COMPLEX, OPP. RTC BUS STAND, RAJAMPET, CUDDAPAH DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Order or Direction, directing the 3rd respondent to permit the petitioner to operate his Firm M/S Sai Balaji Constructions current Account No. 52203200276 at his branch, by declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in freezing the current Account No. 52203200276 of M/S Sai Balaji Copnstructions, at State Bank Of Hyderabad, Rajampet Branch, Cuddapah Dist., by his letter Dt.19-05-2014, on the instructions of the 2nd respondent as illegal, improper and against Law IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 22109 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of the order passed by the 3rd respondent by his letter Dt.19-05-2014, by permitting the petitioner to operate his Firm M/S Sai Balaji Constructions, current Account No. 52203200276, at State Bank Of Hyderabad, Rajampet Branch, pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. 3. UNNAM MURALIDHAR RAO The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 02.09.2025 KAS