Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37234 (RAJ)

NAROTTAM S/O RADHEYSHYAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLBC/65/2025 · 2025-11-20

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:46952] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Bail Cancellation Application No. 65/2025 Narottam S/o Radheyshyam, R/o Rupaheda, Tehsil Khanpur, District Jhalawar. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Luvkush S/o Hansraj, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Mandita, Police Station Sangod, District Kota (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish K. Saini For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 20/11/2025 1. Present bail cancellation application is moved under Section 483(3) of BNSS by the complainant/applicant seeking cancellation of pre-arrest bail granted to the accused-respondent No. 2 vide order dated 28.04.2025 in connection with FIR No. 98/2025 registered at Police Station Khanpur District Jhalawar for the offences under Section 420, 406 IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the order dated 28.04.2025 was passed by the learned Trial Court after considering that matter was triable by the Magistrate as offences are registered under Section 420 and 406 of IPC and detailed reason regarding the same has been specified in the para 5 of the aforesaid order. [2025:RJ-JP:46952] (2 of 2) [CRLBC-65/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has supported the present bail cancellation application. 4. None has appeared on behalf of the accused/non-applicant. 5. Having heard and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that there is no exceptional reason pointed by the learned counsel for the applicant as to why the conditional bail should be intervened by the Court and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is not inclined to allow the present bail cancellation application. 6. Present bail cancellation application is dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /228