Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37234 (AP)

M/s. Pallavi - Maa -GC (JV), v. The State of A.P.,

WP/29919/2018 · 2025-07-15

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010628702018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29919/2018 Between: 1. M/S. PALLAVI - MAA -GC (JV),, AT H.NO. 4-9-856/7, ROAD NO.7B, LECTURERS COLONY,HAYATHNAGAR, RANGA REDDY DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS PROJECT INCHARGE M. SIVASANKAR GOUD. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI (AMARAVATHI), GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SATTENAPAILLY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, RAJUPALEM POLICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT 5. THE TAHSIIDAR, RAJUPALEM MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. KODCLA SIVARAMA KRISHNA, S/O. SRI KODELA SIVA PRASAD, R/O. DOOR NO. 2- 1 5-56/1 4, RAJAP,ARI KOTA, NARASARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 7. ANCHULA NARASIMHA RAO, S/O. RADHAKRISNA MURTHY, MANDAL TDP PRESIDENT, RAJUPALEM, R/O. ANCHULAVARIPALENI VILLAGE, RAJUPALCM MANDAL, GUNTUR 2 DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ or Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 7 in interfering and obstructing the petitioner's vehicles and men from executing the contract work of Nadikudi-Srikalahasti New Broadgage Line Project, Piduguralla-Rompicherla Section at Anchalavaripalem Village and Peda Nemalipuri Villages of Rajupalem Mandal, Guntur District, as being arbitrary, illegal, unreasonable, without jurisdiction and violative of Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and issue consequential direction directing the respondents not to interfere obstruct the execution of the above work by the petitioner and further direct the Police to give protection to the petitioner till the completion of execution of the work and pass such other order or orders. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere or obstruct the petitioner's vehicles and men from executing the contract work of Nadikudi-Srikalahasti New Broadgage Line Project, Piduguralla-Rompicherla Section at Anchalavaripalem Village and Peda Nemalipuri Villages of Rajupalem Mandal, Guntur District, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A GIRIDHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Sri A.Giridhar Rao, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous and petition may be disposed of. 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 is in attendance. 3. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed, since relief has become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 16.07.2025 ARR 4 28 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29919/2018 Dt.16.07.2025 ARR