Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37231 (PNJ)

STATE PB. v. SUKDEV SINGH ETC.

RSA/3180/1998 · 2025-07-14

Vikas Bahl

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RSA-3180-1998 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** RSA-3180-1998 Date of decision : 14.07.2025 The State of Punjab ... Appellant Versus Sukhdev Singh (since deceased) through his LRs and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr.Akhil Kamra, AAG, Punjab for the appellant. Mr.Surender Kumar, Advocate and Mr.Amit Rawat, Advocate for Mr.S.S. Salar, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr.Deepak Goyal, Advocate for respondent no.2. Mr.Atinderpal Singh, Advocate for Mr.K.S. Boparai, Advocate for respondents no.6(a) to 6(c). VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) 1. The suit in the present case was filed by the four plaintiffs in the year 1986 against the State of Punjab and several other defendants. The suit was decreed. Against the same, only State of Punjab had filed an appeal and the said appeal was dismissed. 2. A perusal of the paper book would show that there is no interim order in favour of the appellant-State. Davinder Kumar 2025.07.16 18:39 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment RSA-3180-1998 2 3. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that in view of the lapse of time, the present appeal be disposed of but liberty be granted to the appellant to revive the same in case the respondents approach the office of the concerned department or file execution with respect to the reliefs which as per the State are not admissible to them. 4. In view of the above, the present appeal is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE July 14, 2025. Davinder Kumar Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Davinder Kumar 2025.07.16 18:39 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment