Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:21741] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 823/2025 Ashok S/o Satyanarayan, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Teli Mohalla, Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitesh Rawat For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 23/05/2025
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.434/2022 registered at Police Station-Khandar, District-Sawai Madhopur for the offences under Sections 302 and 143 of IPC.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel further submits that the so called recovery made from the accused-petitioner is dehors the law. There is no independent witness of the incident. Counsel further submits that as per the statement of the medical officer, life of deceased could be saved by timely treatment. Petitioner is behind the bars since 11.12.2022. The trial of the
[2025:RJ-JP:21741] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-823/2025] case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application and submitted that looking to the post mortem report as well as statement recorded during trial, the petitioner is not to be enlarged on bail.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, specifically the statements recorded during trial and post mortem report but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am not inclined to allow the present bail application filed by the petitioner.
6. Hence, the present bail application is hereby dismissed.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/17