Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3723 (KAR)

JAMALSAB S/O BADESAB ASUNDI v. VEERANAGOUDA S/O VENKANAGOUDA GIRIGOUDAR

WP/108072/2017 · 2025-03-20

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5116 WP No. 108072 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 108072 OF 2017 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: JAMALSAB S/O BADESAB ASUNDI, AGE: 63 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS AND AGRICULTURIST, R/O: BENAKANAKONDA, TQ: RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI. … PETITIONER (BY MS. A.P. MACHAK, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. S.N. BANAKAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. VEERANAGOUDA S/O VENKANAGOUDA GIRIGOUDAR, AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: PRIVATE DOCTOR, R/O: HALAGERI, TQ: RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI. 2. PRESIDENT, GRAM PANCHAYAT RANEBENNUR, TQ: RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI. 3. PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, GRAM PANCHAYAT, HALAGERI, TQ: RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI. 4. PRESIDENT, TALUK PANCHAYAT RANEBENNUR, TQ: RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI. 5. TALUK PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, TQ: RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5116 WP No. 108072 of 2017 6. PRESIDENT, ZILLA PANCHAYAT, HAVERI, TQ: AND DIST: HAVERI. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. NARAJJI DEEPAK AND SRI. VINAY S. KOUJALAGI, ADVOCATES FOR R1; SRI. ARVIND D. KULKARNI, ADVOCATE FOR R3; R2, R4 TO R6-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR HEARING- INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Ms.A.P.Machak, counsel on behalf of Sri.S.N.Banakar., for the petitioner has appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken by advocate on record and the petitioner to withdraw the Writ Petition and if an order is passed, he shall not seek for recalling the same. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5116 WP No. 108072 of 2017 The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner and the memo is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE RH/MRP LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 38