2025:JHHC:23021-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 422 of 2025 1. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Program Coordinator (District Rural Development Agency), Jamtara, P.O. & P.S.- Jamtara, District – Jamtara. 2. The Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-Additional District Program Coordinator, District Rural Development Agency, Jamtara, P.O. & P.S.- Jamtara, District – Jamtara. 3. The Director Account Administration and Self Employment, District Rural Development Agency, Jamtara, P.O. & P.S.- Jamtara, District – Jamtara. ... Respondents/Appellants Versus 1. Amit Kumar, aged about 29 years, son of Rajeshwar Ram, Resident of Village – Darudih, P.O- Sangbar, P.S.- Lesliganj, District – Palamu, Jharkhand. ... Petitioner/Respondent 2. The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. The Secretary, Personnel, Administrative Reforms And Rajbhasha Department, Government of Jharkhand , Project Building, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. The Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 5. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Program Coordinator, District Rural Development Agency, Jamtara, P.O. & P.S.- Jamtara, District- Jamtara. 6. The Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-Additional District Program Coordinator, District Rural Development Agency, Hazaribag, P.O. & P.S.- Hazaribag, District- Hazaribag. ... Respondents/Performa Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR --------- For the Appellants: Mr. Sachin Kumar, A.A.G.-II For the Respondents: Mr. D.C. Mishra, Advocate Mr. Abhijeet Anand, Advocate --------- 03/Dated: 11.08.2025 2025:JHHC:23021-DB Tarlok Singh Chauhan, C.J.(Oral) I.A. No. 3169 of 2025 1. Having heard the parties and being satisfied with the grounds shown, the limitation petition is allowed and the delay of 131 days in filing the appeal is condoned. 2. I.A. No.3169 of 2025 stands disposed of. L.P.A. No. 422 of 2025 3. We really wonder why the State has filed the instant appeal, as, from paragraph 5 of the impugned order, it is abundantly clear that the only direction passed by the learned Writ Court is to consider the matter relating to the appointment of the writ petitioner within a period of four months from the date of the receipt/production of a copy of the order. 4. Considering such circumstances, the instant appeal is totally misconceived which is accordingly dismissed. 5. All pending Interlocutory Applications shall stand closed. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) N.A.F.R. Manoj/Pramanik/Cp.2