Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3723 (AP)

Konakalla Reddimma, v. Sri V.China veerabhadrudu

CC/91/2021 · 2025-07-03

R Raghunandan Rao

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010021622021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 91/2021 Between: 1. KONAKALLA REDDIMMA,, S/O, VENKATESWARA RAO, AGE 55 YEARS, OCC SECONDARY GRADE TEACHER, PIRT DISTRICT. AND SCHOOL, K NAGAR, TADIGADAPA, PENAMALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT R/O. 33-16-18, RAMANADHAM STREET, KASTURIBAIPET, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI V CHINA VEERABHADRUDU, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGE 58 YRS, OCC COMMISSIONER, THE COMMISSIONER OF SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT ANJANEYA TOWERS ROAD NO 7/104 B BLOCK 4TH VTPS ROAD IBRAHIMPATNAM KRISHNA DISTRICT 2. R NARASIMHA RAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGE 58 YRS, OCC REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR, THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION KAKINADA EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT A P 3. SMT M V RAJYALAKSHMI, W/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGE 59 YRS, OCC DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER KRISHNA DISTRICT CHILAKALAPUDI MACHILIPATNAM KRISHNA DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents herein for willful disobedience and non-implementing the orders passed by the Honourable Court dated 30-11-2020 in W.P.No. 22476 of 2020 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to stay of all proceeding in pursuance of the proceeding dated 16-01- 2021 vide Rc SPL/2816/2020 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S BALA MOHAN RANGA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. K BHEEMA RAO 2. 3. GP FOR SERVICES III (AP) The Court made the following order: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the orders of the Court have been complied with. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J 04.07.2025 MJA 101 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 91 of 2021 04.07.2025 MJA