Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3723 (ALL)

MINESH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A483/25/2025 · 2025-04-28

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:66494 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 25 of 2025 Applicant :- Minesh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anshu Chaudhary Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 483 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to direct the learned trial court to decide the Criminal Revision No. 234 of 2023 (Premal Shailesh Parekh Vs. State of U.P. and another), under Sections 420, 464, 467, 468, 471, 120B I.P.C., Police Station Mahawan, District Mathura, pending before the learned Additional District Judge, Court No. 7, Mathura, expeditiously within a stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant before this Court is complainant. The complaint was filed in the year 2019 and summoning order was passed on 21.03.2023, against which a criminal revision was filed by opposite party no. 2 and since then said criminal revision is pending but the revisional court is not taking any interest in deciding the said revision. 4. Learned AGA opposed the prayer. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned trial court is directed to make all the endeavours to decide Criminal Revision No. 234 of 2023 (Premal Shailesh Parekh Vs. State of U.P. and another), under Sections 420, 464, 467, 468, 471, 120B I.P.C., Police Station Mahawan, District Mathura, pending before the learned Additional District Judge, Court No. 7, Mathura as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is also made clear that the Court/Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and execution authorities, advocates, parties to the case, staff are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 29.4.2025 Rmk. Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad