Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37225 (AP)

GOALLA YERRISWAMY v. SRI S.S.RAWAT IAS

CC/6907/2023 · 2025-05-07

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 6907 OF 2023 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein, the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 20.07.2023 passed in W.P.No.17005of2023. Between: Goalla Yerriswamy, S/o. Hanumantharayudu, aged 47 years, R/o. 3-90, Narayanapuram Village, Kalyanadurgam Mandal, Ananthapuramu District. ...Petitioner/Petitioner AND 1. Sri S.S.Rawat IAS, Principal Secretary, Department of Finance and Planning, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. Sri Kona Sasidhar IAS, Commissioner, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, NH -16, Tadepalli, Guntur District. 3. Sri B. Chandra Sekhar, Executive Engineer Dharmavaram, Ananthapuramu District. PRI Division, 0 4. Sri I. Salman, Mandal Parishad Development Ananthapuramu District. '■ V' . 5. Sri CB. Govindappa, Executive Authority- Gram Ananthapuramu District. 6. Smt. M. Geethanjali, Sarpanch, r Kalyanadurgam Mandal, Ananthapuramu District. Officer, Kalyanadurgam cum- Panchayat Secretary Kalyanadurgam Mandal, East Kodipalli Panchayat, East Kodipalli Gram Panchyat ...Respondents/Res 2,3,5 to 8 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAMESH BABU TALLURI Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI C. SUMON Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI KIRAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 & 5: The Court made the following; VADLAMUDI SRI G. VENKATA REDDY I APHC010626532023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRUUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 6907/2023 Between: ...PETITIONER Goalla Yerriswamy AND ...CONTEMNOR(S) Sri S S Rawat las and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.RAMESH BABU TALLURI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1.KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI 2.CSUMON 3.G VENKATA REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 20.07.2023 passed in W.P.No.17005 of 2023. "Wi' 2. Sri Ramesh Babu Talluri, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the orders of this Court, disobedience of which is complained of in this , Contempt Case has been complied with and prayed to close the contempt. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 3. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTIO^FFICER 1. Sri S.S.Rawat, IAS., Principal Secretary, Department of Finance and Planning, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. Sri Kona Sasidhar, IAS, Commissioner, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, NH -16, Tadepalli, Guntur District. 3. Sri B. Chandra Sekhar Dharmavaram, Ananthapuramu District. 4. Sri I. Salman, Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Kalyanadurgam, Ananthapuramu District. 5. Sri G. Govindappa, Executive Authority- cum- Panchayat Secretary, East Kodipalli Gram Ananthapuramu District. 6. Smt. M. Geethanjali, Sarpanch, East Kodipalli Gram Panchyat, Kalyanadurgam Mandal, Ananthapuramu District. 7. One CC to Sri. Ramesh Babu Talluri, Advocate [OPUC] 8. One CC to Sri. C Sumon, Advocate [OPUC] 9. One CC to Sri Kiran Kumar Vadlamudi, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri G. Venkata Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] Three CD Copies //TRUE COPY// To. Executive Engineer, PRI Division, Panchayat, Kalyanadurgam Mandal, 10. 11. Pmg sree w HIGH COURT DATED:08/05/2025 ORDER CC.No.6907 of 2023 CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS