MANVI PRIVATE INDUSTRIAL TRAINING INSTITUTE v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/8419/2025 · 2025-11-25
Anuroop Singhi
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37222 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37222 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:47784] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8419/2025 Manvi Private Industrial Training Institute Through Its President Jitendra Kumar Baliwal Son Of Shri Bansidhar Baliwal, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Village- Rampura, Shahpura, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Social Justice And Empowerment, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan
2. The Director, Department Of Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Civil Lines, Jaipur, Rajasthan
3. The Deputy Director Scholarships, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Government Of Rajasthan, G- 3/1, Ambedkar Bhawan, Rajmahal Residency Area, Jaipur-302005. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. MS Raghav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG Mr. Aditya Singh, Dy. GC Mr. Ribhu Dutt HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI
Order 25/11/2025
1. Present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:-
“It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed and by an appropriate writ, order direction:- 1) The impugned order/action of respondents to kept the scholarship portal of Institution on hold from 2023, may kindly be quashed and set aside and direct the Respondents to unhold the portal and release scholarship to the students of Institution. 2) The Petitioner may be permitted to undertake ITI course without any hindrance and no prejudice steps shall be taken against the institution without following the due process of law; 3) Any other appropriate relief which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.
[2025:RJ-JP:47784] (2 of 2) [CW-8419/2025] 4) Costs of the petition may kindly be awarded in favour of the petitioner.”
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in consequence to the inquiries conducted by the respondents, finally a recommendation for unholding the scholarship portal was made. However, despite such recommendation, no order has been passed till date, and with every passing day, the petitioner continues to suffer for no fault of its.
3.
Learned counsel Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, Additional Advocate General submits that the recommendation made by the Deputy Director, Sikar is on the verge of final decision.
4. The operative portion of the recommendation made with the enquiry report dated 12.07.2024 reads as under:-
“
संसान के सत 2022-23
की ननदेशालय दारा नभजवायी
गयी सूची मे छातवृनत भुगतान हो चुके 01
पकरण की रानश
राजकोष मे जमा करवाने एवं शेष 02
पकरणों मे भुगतान नहीं
होने के कारण संसान को छातवृनत पोररल पर ननयमानुसार
अनहोल करने की अनभषंशा की जाती है।"
5. Considering the said limited scope, rather than travelling into the merits of the matter, it is expected from the respondents to take final decision upon the said recommendation made along with the enquiry report dated 12.07.2024 within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order.
6. With the above directions, writ petition stands disposed of.
7. All pending applications also stand disposed of.
(ANUROOP SINGHI),J Sunita/73