Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37222 (HP)

BHUP SINGH CHAUHAN v. NIPUN JINDAL

COPC/1169/2025 · 2025-11-28

Sandeep Sharma

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.1169 of 2025 Date of Decision: 28.11.2025 _______________________________________________________ Bhup Singh Chauhan …….Petitioner Versus Sh. Nipun Jindal … Respondent ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Seema K. Guleria, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record communication dated 27.11.2025, issued under the signatures of Finance Advisor & C.A.O, Himachal Road Transport Corporation, Shimla, Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned counsel for the respondent, states that mandate contained in the judgment alleged to have been violated stands duly complied with. 2. Having perused the aforesaid document, which is taken on record, this Court finds that rate of pension/family pension has been revised at 50% and 30% in the level of Pay Matrix. Since mandate contained in the judgment alleged to have been violated stands duly complied with, no action of the respondent can be said to be contemptuous. 3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly same is disposed of. Liberty is reserved to be petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Court of law qua the surviving grievance, if any. Notices issued to the respondents are hereby discharged accordingly. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge November 28,2025 (shankar)