APHC010627832011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3397] WEDNESDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO IA NO: 1 OF 2024 IN/AND SECOND APPEAL NO: 633/2011 Between: 1. AKETI SUBRAMANYAM,, S/O. PEDDA VENKATA SUBBAIAH, BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO. 10/85, SUBBANNA COMPOUND UPPANAHALLI VILLAGE, DEVANAGARI DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE. 2. AKETI BALA SUBRAMANYAM,, S/O. PEDDA VENKATA SUBBAIAH, BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO. 10/85, SUBBANNA COMPOUND UPPANAHALLI VILLAGE, DEVANAGARI DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE. 3. SORAKAYALA PUSHPALATHA,, W/O. SANKARA NARAYANA, HOUSEWIFE, R/O. P.M.T.COLONY, RAMACHANDRAPURAM, HYDERABAD. 4. P.SUBBALAKSHMAMMA,, W/O. P.SREERAM, HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO. 1564, 17 MAIN, VIJAYANAGAR COLONY, BANGALORE. 5. AKETI SAVITRI,, W/O. RAMA SUBBAIAH, HOUSEWIFE, R/O. A-5-14, III FLOOR, MEERANAGAR TERRACE SOCIETY, KOREGAON PARK, PUNE-I, MAHARASTRA STATE. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. SURAM SUBBALAKSHMAMMA, W/o. Subbarayudu, R/o. D.No. 10/779, Lingabalija Veedhi, Kadapa Town, Kadapa District. ...RESPONDENT IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to record the settlement as arrived at under MOU dt. 09-01-2024 and dispose of THE SA.No.633/2011 accordingly. Counsel for the Appellants: TURAGA SAI SURYA Counsel for the Respondents: 1. Y KAMALA RANI The Court made the following: Judgment: The interlocutory application I.A.No.1 of 2024 is filed under Order XXIII, Rule 3 read with Section 151 of CPC seeking to record the settlement under Memorandum of Understanding dated 09-01-2024 arrived at between the parties and dispose of the second appeal accordingly. 2. When the matter is taken up today, both parties are present along with their respective counsel and produced copies of Aadhaar Cards and both the parties have been identified by their respective counsel. Both parties represented that they have compromised the matter and Memorandum of Understanding entered into between them is enclosed in I.A.No.1 of 2024 and requested to dispose of the second appeal by recording the terms in the said Memorandum of Understanding. 3. Therefore, the interlocutory application is allowed and the terms of compromise are recorded. Accordingly, the second appeal is disposed of by recording terms of compromise entered into between both the parties. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. Each party do bear their own costs in the second appeal. //TRUE COPY// VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO,J To, 2. Two CD Copies HIGH COURT VGKRJ DATED:09/04/2025 ORDER SA 633/2011