APHC010628002013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 13711/2013 Between: 1. M/s.E.I.D.PARRY (India) Ltd., (Formerly M/s Parrys Sugar Industries Ltd/ GMR Industries Ltd/GMR Technologies & Industries Ltd) Sankali Village, R.Amudalavalasa Mandal, Srikakulam District, represented by its General Manager-Legal, Sri B.M.Rath ...PETITIONER AND 1. Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, # 11-4-660, 4th Floor, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad, represented by its Secretary 2. Eastern Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Ltd., represented by its Managing Director, Near Gurudwara, Sethammadhara, P & T colony, Visakhapatnam 530 013 3. Superintending Engineer, Operation Circle, Easten Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Ltd., Eluru, West .Godavari District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 16791 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 2 vacate the interim orders passed on dated 30.4.2013 in WPMP.No.16791 of 2013 in WP.No.13711 of 2013 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WVMP 538 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed on dated 30.4.2013 in WPMP.No.16791 of 2013 in WP.No.13711 of 2013 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S.V.S.S.SIVA RAM Counsel for the Respondent: 1. JYOTHI ESWAR GOGINENI 2. SRINIVASA RAO PUTLURI The Court made the following ORDER: Heard Sri S.V.S.S.Siva Ram, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri K.Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel representing Sri Srinivasa Rao Putluri, learned counsel for the 3rd respondent. 2. The writ petition was admitted on 30.04.2013. An interim order was granted in WPMP No.16791 of 2013 which reads as under: “In the light of the interim order granted in WP No.18779 of 2012, there shall be a direction to respondents 2 and 3 not to collect cross subsidy surcharge from the petitioner to the extent of the power sold by it to the APEPDCL and to the extent consumed by it for its own purposes.” 4. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, both the learned counsel submit that the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by the order dated 20.06.2016 in W.P.Nos.18779 of 2012 and batch passed by the learned single Judge of the composite High Court. 5. Since the issue involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the order dated 20.06.2016 in W.P.Nos.18779 of 2012 and batch, the 3 orders dated 26.10.2012 impugned passed by the 1st respondent in O.P.No.73 to 77 of 2012 are set aside and OPs are remitted to the Regulatory Commission, for consideration afresh. 6. When the court posed a question regarding the stage of the matter earlier remitted, both counsel pleaded ignorance. The learned Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, Visakhapatnam, is directed to dispose of the aforementioned OPs as per law, expeditiously. 7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. ______________________________ SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J Dated 23.06.2025 KA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 13711/2013 Dated 23.06.2025 KA 5