1 2025:CGHC:15341 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPL No. 213 of 2019 1 - Chhattisgarh Hammal Mazdoor Sangh, Through Authorised Signatory Shri Horilal Lodhi And 54 Years S/o Laxman Lodhi C/o Chhattisgarh Hammal Mazoor Sangh, Ward No. 11, Ambedkar Chowk, Shanti Nagar, Rajnandgaon District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Labour, Capital Complex, New Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Department Of Food And Civil Supply Through The Secretary, Capital Complex, New Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur District - Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chhattisgarh State Civil Supply Corporation Through The Manager, Devendra, Nagar, Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Chhattisgarh State Warehousing Corporation Though The Manager, Avanti Vihar, Main Road, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Food Controller, Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Assistant Labour Commissioner, Balashram Parisar, Kutchery Chowk, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 7 - The Collector, Collectorate Parisar, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents SMT NIRMALA RAO -2- For Petitioner : Shri Sudeep Johri, Advocate. For Respondents No.1,2,5 to 7/State: Ms. Shailja Shukla, Dy. G.A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 01.04.2025 1. Heard on admission. 2. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “1-That the Hon'ble court may be kind enough to call the record of the petitioner. 2-That the Hon'ble Court may be kind enough to issue any writ/ writs, order/ orders, direction/ directions in the nature of mandamus and to direct the respondent no. 1 to 5 to comply the Annexure P-5 & P-6. 3-That the Hon'ble Court may be kind enough to pass any writ, order or direction as deemed fit in the circumstances of the case.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that a representation was made by the petitioner before the Assistant Labour Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Raipur on 7.2.2019, but till date, the representation has not been decided. He would submit that a direction may be issued to the said authority to consider the representation and take an appropriate decision expeditiously. 4. No objection from the other side. 3 5. Heard learned counsel appearing for the respective parties and perused the documents present on record. 6. Considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned authority to decide the pending representation of the petitioner in an objective manner, strictly in accordance with the law, within a period of 120 days. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the representation on its own merits without any observation made by this Court. 7. With the aforesaid observation(s), the petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nimmi