2025:JHHC:34128 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (SJ) No.846 of 2024 …. 1. Bhola Pandit, aged about 73 years, S/o Late Chuni Pandit, 2. Manbhran Pandit @ Manbharan Pandit, aged about 44 years, S/O-Bhola Pandit, 3. Gunadhar Pandit, aged about 42 years, S/O Bhola Pandit, 4. Paresh Pandit @ Paresh Kumar Pandit, aged about 22 years, S/O-Manbahran Pandit, 5. Purshpnarayan Pandit, Aged about 29 years, S/O-Ashu Pandit, 6. Santosh Pandit, Aged abou 38 years, S/O-Ashu Pandit, all R/O village-Jamuniyatand, P.O+P.S-Sarath, Dist-Deoghar ……Appellants Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Rajesh Murmu, aged about 37 years, S/O-Haradhan Murmu, R/o Village-Kapsiyo, P.O.+P.S.-Chitra, Dist-Deoghar ……Respondent ----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD ----- For the Appellant : None For the State : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, APP …… Order No.05 /13.11.2025 1. This Criminal Appeal has been filed under Section 14-A of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, on behalf of the appellants by challenging the order dated 01.10.2024 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge, Deoghar in Anticipatory Bail Petition No.871 of 2024 in connection with Sarath P.S. Case No.170/2023, for the offences under Sections 341,323,379,427,504,506/34 of IPC and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, by which the prayer of anticipatory bail of the appellant has been rejected and which is pending in the 2025:JHHC:34128 2 Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Judge Deoghar. 2. It appears that this Criminal Appeal (SJ) was filed on 25.10.2024 but none appears on behalf of the appellant on 11.08.2025, 27.08.2025, 15.10.2025 before this Court and even today i.e. on 13.11.2025 none appears on behalf of the appellants. 3. Under the circumstances, this Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.846 of 2024 is dismissed for default. (Sanjay Prasad, J.) Dated 13.11.2025 Nishant/-