102 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Deepak Kumar and another District Magistrate CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocate for the Mr. Maninder Singh, Addl. AG, Punjab. ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA CM-5931-LPA Application is for restoration of the main dismissed in default vide order dated 2 The application has been filed within limitation and non appearance on the date fixed has been satisfactorily explain In that view of the matter, the application is allowed and order dated 22.07.2025 is recalled. The position. LPA-2188-2024 1. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that in view o subsequent developments, this appeal has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such. 2. Dismissed as having become infructuous. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-5931 LPA-2188 Date of Decision: 05.09.2025 Deepak Kumar and another Vs. Magistrate cum Appellate Tribunal, Hoshiarpur HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWA Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocate for the Mr. Maninder Singh, Addl. AG, Punjab. *** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, J. (Oral) LPA-2025 Application is for restoration of the main dismissed in default vide order dated 22.07.2025. The application has been filed within limitation and non appearance on the date fixed has been satisfactorily explain In that view of the matter, the application is allowed and order .07.2025 is recalled. The appeal is restored to its original number and 2024 (O&M) Learned counsel for the appellants submits that in view o subsequent developments, this appeal has been rendered infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such. Dismissed as having become infructuous. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 5931-LPA-2025 in/and 2188-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 05.09.2025 …Appellants Hoshiarpur & another …Respondents ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Maninder Singh, Addl. AG, Punjab. Application is for restoration of the main appeal which was .07.2025. The application has been filed within limitation and non- appearance on the date fixed has been satisfactorily explained. In that view of the matter, the application is allowed and order is restored to its original number and Learned counsel for the appellants submits that in view of subsequent developments, this appeal has been rendered infructuous and the Dismissed as having become infructuous. which was - In that view of the matter, the application is allowed and order is restored to its original number and f subsequent developments, this appeal has been rendered infructuous and the RAJESH KUMAR 2025.09.08 15:35 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. LPA-2188-2024 (O&M) [2] 3. All pending misc. application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) JUDGE (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE 05.09.2025 rajesh 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/No 2. Whether reportable? : Yes/No RAJESH KUMAR 2025.09.08 15:35 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.