Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37205 (PNJ)

M/S SADBHAV ENGINEER LTD. v. M/S. H.L. GROUP AND OTHERS

CR/1786/2025 · 2025-03-24

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 132 M/s Sadhbav Engineering Ltd. (SEL) M/s M.H. Group and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Constitution of India is for order dated District Judge, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, vide which application 16.03.2023 under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and dated (Annexure petitioner was disposed of/dismissed. to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant the petitioner to raise all the pleas before 24.03.2025 rishu IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-1 Date of Decision: M/s Sadhbav Engineering Ltd. (SEL) Versus M/s M.H. Group and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI Mr. Shrey Shrivastava and Mr. Rajinder S. Rana, Advocates for the petitioner. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is for quashing/setting aside the order dated 07.11.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by the learned District Judge, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, vide which application 16.03.2023 under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and dated P-6 and P-5, respectively) under Section 151 CPC filed by the was disposed of/dismissed. After arguing for some time, when this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant revision petition with liberty to the petitioner to raise all the pleas before the Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty aforesaid. .03.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1786-2025 Date of Decision: 24.03.2025 .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Shrey Shrivastava and Mr. Rajinder S. Rana, Advocates Prayer in this revision petition under Article 227 of the setting aside the impugned common ) passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, vide which applications dated 16.03.2023 under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and dated 16.03.2023 under Section 151 CPC filed by the fter arguing for some time, when this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he revision petition with liberty to the Commercial Court. with the liberty aforesaid. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No Prayer in this revision petition under Article 227 of the impugned common Additional dated 16.03.2023 under Section 151 CPC filed by the fter arguing for some time, when this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he revision petition with liberty to RISHU KATARIA 2025.03.25 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.