M/S SADBHAV ENGINEER LTD. v. M/S. H.L. GROUP AND OTHERS
CR/1786/2025 · 2025-03-24
Nidhi Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37205 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37205 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
132
M/s Sadhbav Engineering Ltd. (SEL)
M/s M.H. Group and others
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI
Present: -
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Constitution of India is for
order dated District Judge, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, vide which application 16.03.2023 under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and dated (Annexure petitioner was disposed of/dismissed.
to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant the petitioner to raise all the pleas before
24.03.2025 rishu
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-1 Date of Decision: M/s Sadhbav Engineering Ltd. (SEL) Versus
M/s M.H. Group and others
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI
Mr. Shrey Shrivastava and Mr. Rajinder S. Rana, Advocates
for the petitioner.
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Prayer in this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is for quashing/setting aside the
order dated 07.11.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by the learned District Judge, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, vide which application 16.03.2023 under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and dated P-6 and P-5, respectively) under Section 151 CPC filed by the was disposed of/dismissed.
After arguing for some time, when this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant revision petition with liberty to the petitioner to raise all the pleas before the
Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty aforesaid. .03.2025
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether Reportable
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1786-2025 Date of Decision: 24.03.2025
.… Petitioner
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Shrey Shrivastava and Mr. Rajinder S. Rana, Advocates Prayer in this revision petition under Article 227 of the setting aside the impugned common ) passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, vide which applications dated 16.03.2023 under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and dated 16.03.2023 under Section 151 CPC filed by the fter arguing for some time, when this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he revision petition with liberty to the Commercial Court. with the liberty aforesaid.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Yes/No
Prayer in this revision petition under Article 227 of the impugned common Additional dated 16.03.2023 under Section 151 CPC filed by the fter arguing for some time, when this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he revision petition with liberty to RISHU KATARIA 2025.03.25 10:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.