2025:HHC:44594 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No. 671 of 2024 Decided on: 19.12.2025 Joga Singh … Petitioner Versus Jaswinder Kaur and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ___________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Ashok Kumar Tyagi, Advocate for respondent No.1. : Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 3. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- “It is therefore, respectfully prayed that the present petition may kindly be allowed and the impugned orders dated 17.07.2023 and 15.03.2024 (Annexure P-4 & Annexure P-6) passed by the learned court below may kindly be set aside and to stay the execution of the order or any further order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Record demonstrates that the matter was listed before 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:44594 this Court firstly on 27.11.2024, but no interim was granted. In light of the fact that the petitioner has assailed the orders passed by learned Courts below vis-à-vis the grant of interim maintenance to the contesting respondents, this petition is disposed of with the direction that the main petition be taken to its logical conclusion by the learned Trial Court as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six months from today. In the course of the adjudication of the main petition, the petitioner shall be at liberty to raise the issue with regard to payment of maintenance to the contesting respondents, if any. This shall include the right of the petitioner to agitate the quantum thereof also. If the Court ultimately finds merit with the submissions of the petitioner, then it goes without saying that whatever maintenance is being paid to the respondents, shall be adjusted accordingly, however, it is clarified that this Court has not made in observation as far as the merit of the issue is concerned and learned Court below shall decide the petition before it, uninfluenced of any observations made by this Court in the course of disposal of these proceedings. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge December 19, 2025 (narender)