IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY i TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE 1 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 37557 OF 2022 Between: 1. Endluri Sapura, W/o.Magbul, Aged about 52 R/o.Putlampalli, Kadapa Mandal, Y.S.R.District. 2. E.Haseena, W/o. E.Naveen Kumar, Aged about 58 Wife, R/o.Putlampalli, Kadapa Mandal, Y.S.R.District. 3. E.Nagaraju, S/o.E.Narayana, Aged about “ R/o.Putlampalli, Kadapa Mandal, Y.S.R.District. 4. Kotapati Giridhar, S/o.K.Narasimhulu, Aged about coolie, R/o.Putlampalli, Kadapa Mandal, Y.S.R.District. 5. Kotapati Narasimhulu, S/o. Penchaliah, Aged about 66 Coolie, R/o.Putlampalli, Kaddba Mandal, Y.S.R.District. years, Occ- House Wife years, Occ- House 47 years, Occ- Coolie 55 years, Occ- years, Occ- ...Petitioners and 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh; Rep. by its Principal Secretary Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi I . 2. The District Collector, Kadapa, YSR District 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kadapa Revenue Division District. 4. The Tahsildar, Kadapa Mandal, Kadapa, YSR District. Revenue Guntur District, YSR ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a writ order Or direction nature of a writ mandamus declaring the high respondent no 4 and his subordinates in interfering in our construction activity in the house plots located in an extent of 3 cents each in sy nos 154/1, 155/1 156/1 of putlampalli kadapa mandal may more particularly one in the handed action of the ysr district eventhrough the respondent no 4 has issued possession certificates through possession certificates nos 1120/1416 dated 30/03/2017 1114/1416 dated 30/03/2007 '1 1121/1416 dated 20/03/2007, 1108/1416 dated 20/03/2007, 1110/1416 It , , <lated ?0/3/2007 and that too without issuance of any notice due to political . pressure as arbitrary illegal contrary to the well established legal principles ap3rt ''from being violative of fundamental and constitutional rights guaranteed us under article 14,19,21 and 300-A of the constitution of india and consequently direct the respondent nos 4 and his subordinates not to interfere in our construction activity in the house plots located in an extent of 3 cents each in sy nos 154/1,155/1,156/1 of putlampalli kadapa mandal ysr district. lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the direct the respondent Nos. 4 and his subordinates not to interfere in our construction activity in the house plots located in an extent of 3 cents each in Sy.Nos. 154/1, 155/1, 156/1 of Putlampalli, Kadapa Mandal, Y.S.R.District, without following due process of law, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI P V N KIRAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: APHC010624632022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] WEDNESDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 37557/2022 Between: ...PETITIONER(S) Endluri Sapura, and Others AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.P VN KIRAN KUMAR \ Counsel for the Respondent{S): I ) / 1.GP FOR REVENUE ! The Court made the following order: The short grievance of the petitioners is that the respondent authorities are interfering with the construction activity in the house plots located in an extent of Ac.0.03 cents each in Sy.Nos. 154/1, 155/1, 156/1 of Putlampalii, Kadapa Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, without issuance of prior notices to them. I Heard Sri P.V.N.Kiran Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri J.Krishna Praneeth, learned AssistantGovernmentPleader for Revenue. 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue on counter submitted that, as of now, the 4*^ respondent is not interfering with the 3. »»■ petitioners’ property as alleged by them. As such there remains nothing for adjudication and accordingly prayed to close the writ petition. 4. A perusal of Para No.05 in the counter filed by the respondent- tahsildar would indicate that, the respondent authorities are not interfering with the petitioner’s property as alleged by them and if at all the property is required by the Government, they would follow due process of law in respect of subject properties. In view of the same, as the authorities have intention to follow due process of law, there is no purpose in keeping the writ petition pending. As such this Court is inclined to dispose of the writ petition with the following direction: . “The respondent authorities are directed not to interfere with the subject properties, except under due process of law. ” Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. II Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY, REGISTRAR \ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Andhra Kradesh, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District 2. The District Collector, Kadapa, YSR District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kadapa Revenue Division District. 4. The Tahsildar, Kadapa Mandal, Kadapa, YSR District. 5. One CC to Sri P V N Kiran Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, .High Court of Andhra 7. Three CD Copies A.P. YSR Pradesh. [OUT] RAM 4 f . » t\ •* filOH COURT o » « ^ / ■■ :: V DATED:05/02/2025 ORDER t? -y 1 7 FFR 2m r o . Curreni oecuun . . ^ggSPATCW^?^- WP.No.37557 of 2022 DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS