1 2025:CGHC:5896 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1140 of 2024 Vinay Shukla S/o Late Ramesh Chandra Shukla, Aged About 41 Years R/o Shiva Plastic, In Front Of Songanga Colony, Main Get, Seepat Main Road P.S. Sarkanda, District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant versus 1 - Himshikhar Gupta The - Then Secretary, Cooperative Department, Now Games And Youth Welfare With Home And Jail Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralay, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Dsistrict- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - C.R. Prasanna Secretary, Cooperative Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralay, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Dsistrict- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Ramesh Sharma, The-Then Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Dsistrict- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. --- At Present Special Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Manager And Director Of Land Records, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralay, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Dsistrict- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Deepak Soni, The-Then Registrar, Cooperative Scieties, --- Now Collector Baloda Bazar - Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Kuldeep Sharma, Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Indrawati Bhawan Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicant : Dr. Sahin Kale, Advocate. For Respondents No. 1,2,3 & 5 : Mr. Yashraj Verma, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Amrito Das, Advocate. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon’ble Mr. Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order on Board 31/01/2025 1. Heard on I.A. No. 2/2025, which is an application for withdrawal of the Vakalatnama filed by earlier Counsel Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey, Advocate of applicant, who is also present. 2 2. Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey, Advocate submits that since applicant has engaged other counsel to argue the matter, therefore, he has given NOC to the applicant, hence, he may be permitted to withdraw the Vakalatnama filed by him. 3. On due consideration, the application is allowed. Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey, Advocate is permitted to withdraw his Vakalatnama. 4. This contempt petition has been filed alleging non-compliance of the order dated 29.09.2023 passed by this Court in Writ Petition (C) No. 3097 of 2021 passed by this Court. 5. This Court has passed the following order in WPC No. 3097 of 2021, in paragraph 7, annexed as Annexure- C/1. “7. In view of the aforementioned facts of the case, submission of learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition at this stage is disposed of directing respondents No. 1 & 2 to conclude proceeding started on 23.11.2020 at the earliest, preferably within a period of 6 months from the date of receipt of order passed by this Court.” 6. Learned counsel appearing for respondents No. 1, 2 ,3 & 5 would submit that order complained of dated 29.09.2023 passed in WPC No. 3097 of 2021 has been complied with and proceeding has been concluded vide order dated 30.01.2025 passed by respondent authorities. It is submitted that copy of the order dated 30.01.2025 passed by respondent authorities has been supplied to the applicant. 7. Counsel for the applicant submits that aforesaid order dated 30.01.2025 has not been passed in its letter & spirit by respondent No. 3, as that order itself is against paragraph 8 of the reply filed by respondents. 8. Vide order under contempt dated 29.09.2023, a direction was given to respondents No. 1 & 2 to conclude proceeding started on 23.11.2020 and in 3 compliance of that order, respondent authorities has passed the order dated 30.01.2025. Copy of the same has been filed before this Court by counsel for the respondents, as such, order complained of has been complied with, therefore, I do not find any reason to proceed further in the matter initiating contempt proceeding against the respondents. 9. Counsel for the respondents No. 1, 2, 3 & 5 is directed to file copy of the order dated 30.01.2025 passed by respondent authorities alongwith covering memo during course of the day. 10. Accordingly, contempt proceeding is dropped and rule issued is discharged. However, if any grievance is left with the petitioner, he may take recourse to law. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Digitally signed by AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Date: 2025.02.04 16:54:53 +0530