IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30647 of 2025 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65194 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-165 Year-2024 Thana- UDWANTNAGAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1. Rajendra Prasad Singh Son of Late Brahma Singh Resident of village- Purvi nima, ps- udwantnagar, dist- bhojpur 2. Vimal Kumar singh Son of Amrit singh Resident of village- Sakhua PS -Ud- wantnagar District -Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Raju Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nirmal Kumar Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 3 08-08-2025 1. On call, a prayer was made on behalf of the petitioners for “pass over” for the day. 2. The present application has been filed for modification of the order dated 22.10.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 65194 of 2024 whereby the present petitioners have been granted privilege of anticipatory bail subject to the condition that the petitioners shall surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of order. 3. The petitioner in paragraph no. 4 of the application has stated that due to financial crisis the petitioners have not deposited the amount in government account within stipulated time as per the order dated 22.10.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30647 of 2025(3) dt.08-08-2025 2/2 No. 65194 / 2024 and has sought further two weeks time to surrender before the learned District Court. 4. From perusal of the records, statement made in the modification application and considering the fact that the petitioners are not willing to refund / deposit the balance amount of Rs. 33,59,710/- in four installments as quantified by this court and agreed upon by the petitioners at the time of granting bail, I find no merit in the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, this modification application is dismissed. praful/- (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) U T