IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 2288 of 2025 Date of Decision: 14.11.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Pawan Kumar ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Somesh Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan Kahol and Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocate General. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) By way of present execution petition, prayer has been made by the petitioner for implementation and execution of order/judgment dated 7.7.2025, passed by this Court in CWP No. 6145 of 2024, titled Pawan Sharma v. State of Himachal Pradesh and Anr., whereby afore petition came to be disposed of with a direction to respondent/competent authority to promote the petitioner to the post of Assistant Conservator of Forests (HPFS) from the year 2003 alongwith consequential benefits, within two months. Since no action, whatsoever, came to be taken at the behest of the 2 respondents pursuant to aforesaid direction, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings. 2. Mr. Anish Banshtu, learned Deputy Advocate General, states that though he has every reason to presume and believe that by now, order/judgment sought to be executed, must have been complied with in its totality, but if not, same would be definitely complied with within a period of four weeks from today. 3. Consequently, in view of the fair stand adopted by the learned Deputy Advocate General, this Court sees no reason to keep present petition alive and accordingly, same is disposed of with direction to the respondents to do the needful in terms of judgment alleged to have been violated within a period four weeks, failing which petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken towards implementation of the order/judgment. November 14, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge