CONT.CAS(C) 85/2025& CONT.CAS(C) 87/2025 1 $~74&75 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 85/2025 DEVENDRA KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitin Kr. Gupta with Ms. Pranjal Vyas, Advocates. versus NITESH KUMAR MISHRA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vineet Dhanda, CGSC with Ms. Akanksha Chaudhary, Ms. Haridas Medha, Mr. Raghuvendra, Mr. Piyush Gupta, CGSC with Mr. Atishay Jain andMr. Prateek Gupta, Advocates. 75 + CONT.CAS(C) 87/2025 RITU & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitin Kr. Gupta with Ms. Pranjal Vyas, Advocates. versus NITESH KUMAR MISHRA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vineet Dhanda, CGSC with Ms. Akanksha Chaudhary, Ms. Haridas Medha, Mr. Raghuvendra, Mr. Piyush Gupta, CGSC with Mr. Atishay Jain andMr. Prateek Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN O R D E R % 10.02.2025 CM APPL. 7816/2025 in CONT.CAS(C) 85/2025& CM APPL. 7765/2025 in CONT.CAS(C) 87/2025 1. These petitions were disposed of on 23.01.2025. The relevant paragraphs of the above said order read as under:- “5.Undoubtedly, as per the specific directions contained therein, there is no impediment on the part of the respondents to continue with the investigation but, at the same time, in order to protect the interest This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 01:31:01 CONT.CAS(C) 85/2025& CONT.CAS(C) 87/2025 2 of the concerned petitioners, there is a specific direction that they would be appointed subject to the final outcome of the investigation by Institute of Banking Personnel Selection (IBPS). 6. Very clearly, as per the directions contained in the above said judgment dated 12.11.2024, the petitioners have to be granted appointment within four weeks. 7. Though the offer of appointment has already been issued on 13.12.2024 i.e. within the period of four weeks, as noted already, according to the petitioners, this is only a paper formality as they have not been posted, despite completion of the requisite formalities. 8. Learned counsel for the respondents i.e. Director General, NYKS is present on advance notice and submits that there is no attempt of any kind, whatsoever, to disobey the specific directions contained in the above said order. It is submitted that the offer letter was issued within the stipulated period and the matter is stuck up only because of the fact that certain procedural formalities have yet not been completed. 9.After taking requisite instructions, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that let the petitioners report to their Head office situated at 4-Jeevan Deep Building, Ground Floor, Sansad Marg, New Delhi, Delhi-110001 on 27.01.2025 at 11:00 am and if the procedural formalities are completed by them, further needful be done positively within five working days. 10. The petitions are disposed of in view of the aforesaid assurance.” 2. The applications have now been moved seeking directions in the matter as despite the fact that the petitioners had reported on 27.01.2025, they have not been issued any posting order. 3. Learned counsel for respondents appears on advance notice and This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 01:31:01 CONT.CAS(C) 85/2025& CONT.CAS(C) 87/2025 3 submits that there were some discrepancies with respect to the statement of marks and they are awaiting some response from the concerned University. 4. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that if during any further scrutiny/verification of said marks-sheet, Department learns that any detail furnished by the petitioners is incorrect they may pass appropriate order but the posting cannot be delayed for the above said reason. 5. After hearing arguments for some time, learned counsel for respondents, without prejudice to their rights and contentions, submits that they would issue requisite posting order within a period of two days from today. They, however, reserve their rights to take appropriate action against the respondents, in case, the statements of marks of the petitioners is not duly verified by the concerned University and also reserve their rights take further action against them in terms of order dated 12.11.2024 passed in W.P.(C) No. 6583/2023. 6. Learned Counsel for petitioners, in view of said submission and assurance, does not seek any further relief. 7. The applications stand disposed of accordingly. MANOJ JAIN, J FEBRUARY 10, 2025/sw This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 01:31:01