[2025:RJ-JP:28546-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 541/2025 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Home Secretary, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director General Of Police, Police Headquaters, Jaipur. 3. The Supedrintendent Of Police, Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Appellants Versus Mishro Bai Meena D/o Sanval Ram Meena, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Tilwar, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Samee Khan & Ms. Sunita Meena for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG For Respondent(s) : Mr. Aamir Khan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Order 25/07/2025 1. Learned counsel for the appellants fairly submits that the issue raised in the present appeal stands already decided by this Court in several cases with lead case in D.B. SAW No.61/2024- State of Rajasthan & Ors. vs. Vinod Kumar Meena & Ors. decided along with other bunch of special appeals wherein this Court had held as under: “(3) Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the order dated 13.12.2016 passed in the case of Jagdish (supra), we find that in the aforesaid decision, the Division Bench of this Court, after thoroughly examining the provisions of the applicable rules and the facts of the case, came to the conclusion that as far as the salary part is concerned, the petitioners are entitled to salary for the period they were in service. However, as far as the expenses [2025:RJ-JP:28546-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-541/2025] incurred on training is concerned, that is liable to be paid to the employer. (4) In the present case, the respondents, vide impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge, have been granted only salary part and there is no order protecting them from recovery against expenses incurred on training. That being the legal and actual position, the issue raised in this batch of appeals is squarely covered by order dated 13.12.2016 passed in the case of Jagdish (supra). (5) Accordingly, the State appeals are liable to be dismissed and are accordingly dismissed." 3. In view of above, the present Appeal is dismissed, accordingly. 4. Pending application(s), if any shall stand disposed of. (CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J GAURAV /GARIMA/161