- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3911 WP No. 35955 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 35955 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: H.M. MANASA, W/O K.N. SURYA PRAKASH, AGED 49 YEAS, RESIDING AT NO.198, ROYAL HERMITAGE BANNERGHATTA ROAD, GOTTIGERE, BANGALORE - 560 083. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAVEEN B.H, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER CANARA BANK, HONG KONG BRANCH, REPRESENTED THROUGH CANARA BANK, DEVANAHALLI BRANCH, BANGALORE - 562 110, ALSO AT ARM-1 BRANCH, 2ND FLOOR, NO.86, SPENCER TOWER, M G ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. M/S. MSK SHELTERS, OFFICE AT NO.2, 13TH CROSS ROAD, ATTIMABBE ROAD, C T BED EXTENSION, BANASHANKARI 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE - 560 070, REPRESENTED BY RESPONDENTS 3 AND 4. Digitally signed by DHARMALINGAM Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3911 WP No. 35955 of 2024 3. SRI. M. SURESH KUMAR, S/O SRI. MUNISWAMY, RESIDING AT NO.2, MSK SQUARE, 13TH CROSS, CT BED EXTENSION, BANASHANKARI 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE - 560 070. 4. SMT. MEDERAMELTA REKHA, W/O SRI. M. SURESH KUMAR, RESIDING AT NO.2, MSK SQUARE, 13TH CROSS, CT BED EXTENSION, BANASHANKARI 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE - 560 070. 5. M/S. AMALOR INTERNATIONAL LIMITED AT NO.1005, SOUTH CHINA BUILDING, NO.1, WYNDHAM STREET, CENTRAL, HONGKONG. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIGNESH SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A. TO HOLD AND DECLARE THAT THE ENTIRE ACTION INITIATED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 1 UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE SECURITIZATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002 AS ILLEGAL AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3911 WP No. 35955 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 28.01.2025 stating that respondent No.1 has withdrawn the impugned sale notice and an OTS proposal is offered to the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner does not wish to pursue the matter. 2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43 CT: BHK