Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37185 (RAJ)

JAFAR KHA S/O SHRI FAJJAR KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLBC/133/2025 · 2025-10-13

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41771] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Bail Cancellation Application No. 133/2025 Jafar Kha S/o Shri Fajjar Khan, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Chanduki, Police Station Sadar Alwar District Alwar Rajasthan. ----Complainant/Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Ritik S/o Shri Manohar Lal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Burja, Police Station Sadar District Alwar (Raj.) ----Non-Petitioner For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, AGA Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 13/10/2025 1. The instant bail cancellation application has been filed under Section 483(3) of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 614/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali Alwar District Alwar for the offence(s) under Sections 115(2), 126(2) and 189 (2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard and considered the submissions made by the counsel representing both the parties, and perused the material available on record. 3. Taking note of the impugned order whereby bail was granted which is re-produced below: “7- dsl Mk;jh ds voyksdu ls izdV gksrk gS fd vkgr ds 'kjhj ds fdlh ekfeZd vax ij dksbZ xaHkhj pksV dkfjr ugha gqbZ gSA pksV la[;k 03] tks fd xaHkhj migfr gksuk crk;k x;k gS] og vkgr ds gkFk ij dkfjr gksuk izdV gksrk gS ,oa ,Dljs fjiksVZ esa bl pksV [2025:RJ-JP:41771] (2 of 2) [CRLBC-133/2025] dks vkgr ds thou ds fy, izk.k?kkrd gksus ds laca/k esa dksbZ vadu ugha fd;k tkuk dsl Mk;jh ds voyksdu ls izFkn`"V~;k izdV gksrk gSA izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dks fnukad 02-09-2025 dks fxj¶rkj fd;k tkdj] og foxr fujUrj 08 fnuksa ls iqfyl@U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa gSA izdj.k vHkh vuqla/kku dh izfØ;k ls xqtj jgk gSA vuqla/kku o fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk ls badkj ugha fd;k tk ldrk gSA xq.kkoxq.k ij fVIi.kh fd;k tkuk fgrdj ugha gSA vr% izdj.k ds leLr rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq;s izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dks bl ekeys esa tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA** It is noted that the learned Trial Court has duly analyzed that none of the injury was life threatening; that there are no criminal antecedents qua the non-applicant; that they are young boys; and the period of custody of the non-applicant. 4. In the facts and circumstances, when all the vital aspects are duly considered, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the present matter. Nevertheless, an additional condition is imposed upon the non-applicant (accused) that he shall refer/restrain himself from causing any threat or interfere in the life of applicant. 5. Accordingly, the instant bail cancellation application is dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/254