Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(RNT,J & MRK,J A.S. NO.629 OF 2005)
APHC010624552005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] THURSDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM FIRST APPEAL NO: 629/2005 Between: M/s Brunda Housing Pvt Ltd ...APPELLANT AND K Balamani and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant:
1. P VENUGOPAL
2. K V BHANU PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. UTTARA LEGAL
2. KOWTURU PAVAN KUMAR The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)
This appeal has been filed by the appellant/plaintiff, aggrieved by the dismissal of his suit by judgment and decree dated 27.04.2005 passed in O.S.No.7 of 2001 on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Tirupati.
(RNT,J & MRK,J A.S. NO.629 OF 2005)
2. Sri K.Sai Sri Harsha,
learned counsel representing Sri K.V.Bhanu Prasad, learned counsel for the appellant-company, appearing through virtual mode, submits the director of the appellant’s company, through whom the appeal was filed, passed away long ago, and in spite of efforts being made, the appellant is not responding, and consequently, he is unable to prosecute the appeal.
3. In view of the above, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. The interim order granted by this Court in A.S.M.P.No.2094 of 2005 on 18.10.2005 stands vacated.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed.
____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J
______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Date : 03.04.2025. RPD.
(RNT,J & MRK,J A.S. NO.629 OF 2005)
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
(DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION)
APPEAL SUIT NO: 629 OF 2005
Date: 03.04.2025
RPD.