[2025:RJ-JP:47256] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17124/2025 Thandi Lal Meena S/o Syoram Meena, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Nirjharna, Lalsot Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretariat, School Education, Govt. Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Jaipur. 4. The District Education Officer, Headquarter (Elementary) Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 18/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may very graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and further be pleased to: i) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the respondents be directed to grant salary and allowances and notional benefits and other service benefits to Petitioner as given to the candidates who selected/appointed for the post of Teacher Gr. III. ii) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the respondents be directed to give all service benefit/promotion/notional benefits as [2025:RJ-JP:47256] (2 of 2) [CW-17124/2025] given in the case of Manoj Khandelwal vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors, SBCWP No. 7283/2014, decided on 16.7.2014 III Pass any other appropriate order which this Honble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the Petitioner. Cost of the writ petition be also awarded in favour of the Petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 06.10.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14544/2025 titled as “Ruchi Mathuria Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.” submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, in case of Manoj Khandelwal & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SB CWP no. 7283/2014 (16.07.2014). He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of Manoj Khandelwal & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (supra) and respondents are to extend same benefit to the petitioner, if avernments & facts as stated herein are found to be correct, after examination. 4. Instant writ petition with misc. application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /87