APHC010620392018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 30000/2018 Between: 1. ISNAKULA JANARDHAN REDDY, S/O. LATE GURUVA REDDY,AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO.2/97, M.R PALLI, TIRUPATI. 2. DOMMARAJUNARAYANARAJU,, S/O. D. VENKATARAJU ,AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.9/76, MUTHYALAREDDYPALLIPANCHAYAT, AMARAVATHINAGAR, TIRUPATHI. CHITOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. C. JAYACHANDRARAJU,, S/O. C.RAMARAJU,AGED ABOUT42 SEARS, R/O.FLAT NO. 205, KOTA ELSON TOWERS. THIRUCHANOOR ROAD, KENNEDY NAGAR. TIRUPATHI. CHITOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. SUPERINTEND OF POLICE, TIRUPATI URBAN, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. ADDL SUPERINTEND OF POLICE, TIRUPATI URBAN, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, M.R.PALLY POLICE STATION, TIRUPATI, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. MUKKAMALA SRI SAI RAGHU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 2 “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the second and third respondents in considering the representation dated 01.08.2018 and failing to take any action pursuant to the same, as illegal. arbitrary, highhanded and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and thereby direct the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 to consider the representation dated.01-08-2018.” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that, based on the report given by Petitioners, enquiry was conducted and they have complied with the interim order passed in this petition. Hence, the petition may be disposed of. 3. None represented for the Petitioners. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:24.07.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.30000 of 2018 Dt.24.07.2025 Dinesh