Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37173 (RAJ)

VIKAS AGARWAL S/O LALIT KUMAR AGARWAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/7468/2024 · 2025-05-27

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:22301] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8106/2024 Ramnarayan Bairwa S/o Shree Gangaram Bairwa, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Village-Mumana, Tehsil- Piplu, District Tonk, (Raj) ----Complainant/Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP 2. The Director General Of Police Rajasthan, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi Jaipur. 3. The Commissioner Of Police, Commissionerate Jaipur. 4. The Deputy Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur Metropolitan South, Commissionerate Jaipur. 5. The Inspector General Of Police, Cid (CB) Jaipur, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi Jaipur. 6. The S.H.O. Police Station Shivdaspura, Jaipur City South, Jaipur. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7468/2024 Vikas Agarwal S/o Lalit Kumar Agarwal, Aged 49 Years, R/o A- 10, Jai Jawan First (1), Colony, Tonk Road, Jaipur (Raj). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Public Prosecutor. 2. Ram Narayan Bairwa S/o Gangaram, R/o Mumana, Piplu, Niwayi, Tonk Road, Rajasthan. ----Complainant-Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijendra Yadav Mr. Manish Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, P.P. with Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P. Mr. Kunwar Rashtradeep, IPS, Addt. Commissioner of Police, Crime Mr. Virendra, SHO, P.S. Shivdaspura [2025:RJ-JP:22301] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-8106/2024] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 27/05/2025 S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.8106/2024 is filed seeking directions for fair and impartial investigation in FIR No. 01/2024 and S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.7468/2024 is filed seeking quashing of FIR No. 01/2024. In compliance of the directions passed in erstwhile order, Additional Commissioner of Police (Law and Order and Crime) has marked presence and has submitted that investigation is on the verge of culmination. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the fact that investigation is at the stage of culmination, this Court deems it apposite to not interfere in the present petitions. Howsoever, respective parties are directed to mark their presence in the office of Additional Commissioner of Police (Law and Order and Crime) on 03.06.2025 at 11:00 and 12:00 AM, respectively and put forth their plea. Further, concerned Officer is directed to consider the plea of the respective parties and thereafter take a decision, in accordance with law. Respective parties are at liberty to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, if aggrieved by the decision of concerned Officer. Accordingly, the present petitions are disposed of with the aforementioned directions. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. A copy of this judgment be placed in connected petition(s). (SAMEER JAIN),J GAURAV/91-92