[2025:RJ-JP:48794] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No.1467/2025 1. Kanhaiya Lal Son Of Shri Rajaram, Aged About 72 Years, Resident Of Village Dangda Hadoti, Police Station Sapotara, District Karauli (Raj.) 2. Ashok Son Of Kanhaiya Lal, Resident Of Village Dangda Hadoti, Police Station Sapotara, District Karauli (Raj.) 3. Rakesh Son Of Kanhaiya, Resident Of Village Dangda Hadoti, Police Station Sapotara, District Karauli (Raj.) 4. Sewa Bai Wife Of Dhankesh, Resident Of Village Dangda Hadoti, Police Station Sapotara, District Karauli (Raj.) 5. Nareshi Wife Of Ashok, Resident Of Village Dangda Hadoti, Police Station Sapotara, District Karauli (Raj.) 6. Dhankesh Son Of Kanhaiya, Resident Of Village Dangda Hadoti, Police Station Sapotara, District Karauli (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. The Director General Of Police, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Superintendent Of Police, Karauli, District Karauli (Raj.) 4. The Station House Officer, Police Station Sapotara, District Karauli (Raj.) 5. Circle Officer Of Police, Sapotara, District Karauli (Raj.) 6. Jitendra Son Of Kadu, Resident Of Village Dangda Hadoti, Police Station Sapotara, District Karauli (Raj.) 7. Kadu Son Mudya, Resident Of Village Dangda Hadoti, Police Station Sapotara, District Karauli (Raj.) 8. Mahendra Son Of Kadu, Resident Of Village Dangda Hadoti, Police Station Sapotara, District Karauli (Raj.) 9. Pappu Son Of Prahlad, Resident Of Village Dangda Hadoti, Police Station Sapotara, District Karauli (Raj.) 10. Prahlad Son Of Mudya, Resident Of Village Dangda Hadoti, Police Station Sapotara, District Karauli (Raj.) 11. Lavkush Son Of Brijlal, Resident Of Village Dangda Hadoti, Police Station Sapotara, District Karauli (Raj.) 12. Rishikesh Son Of Ramesh, Resident Of Village Dangda [2025:RJ-JP:48794] (2 of 3) [CRLW-1467/2025] Hadoti, Police Station Sapotara, District Karauli (Raj.) 13. Vijendra Son Of Hari, Resident Of Village Dangda Hadoti, Police Station Sapotara, District Karauli (Raj.) 14. Brijlal Son Of Mudya, Resident Of Village Dangda Hadoti, Police Station Sapotara, District Karauli (Raj.) 15. Prakash Son Of Battilal, Resident Of Village Dangda Hadoti, Police Station Sapotara, District Karauli (Raj.) 16. Raju Son Of Batti Lal, Resident Of Village Dangda Hadoti, Police Station Sapotara, District Karauli (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Pandey For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 01/12/2025 1. Defect(s) pointed out by the Office stands waived. 2. The instant criminal writ petition has been preferred by the petitioners with the following prayers:- “It is, therefore, humbly prayed that your lordship may kindly be pleased to accept this Criminal Writ petition and i. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondent authorities to provide adequate police protection to the petitioners and their family members so as to safeguard their life and property from the continuous threats and illegal acts of the accused persons and Pass an order restraining the accused persons from interfering, trespassing, or causing damage to the agricultural land and standing crops of the petitioner in any manner whatsoever and orders may kindly be issued to allow them to cultivate their agricultural land with police assistance in the larger interest of justice. ii. Any other relief which may deem fit and proper may also kindly be granted in favour of the petitioners.” [2025:RJ-JP:48794] (3 of 3) [CRLW-1467/2025] 3. Multiple prayers have been made, which cannot be entertained by this Court under its writ jurisdiction, contained under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners are at liberty to approach appropriate forum of law for redressal of their grievances. So far as seeking protection is concerned, the petitioners are at liberty to approach the concerned Police Station by way of filing a representation. 4. In case, such representation is submitted by the petitioners with the concerned Police Station, the same would be considered and decided in accordance with law. 5. Accordingly, the instant criminal writ petition stands disposed of. Stay application as well as all applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/210