APHC010624472018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3368] FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 29812/2018 Between: 1. SMT.MEENIGA NAGAMANI, W/O.PEDDA NARASIMHA, AGED ABOUT. 32 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE-WIFE AND AGRICULTURIST, R/O. UMAMAHESHWARAPURAM VILLAGE, MUNDLAMUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, (HOME), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. 4. SRI SIVANANCHARAIAH MOPIDEVI, SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUNDLAMUR POLICE STATION, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. NALLABOTHULA RAMAMMARAMULU, W/O.LATE KOTESWAR RAO, AGED ABOUT. 84 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE-WIFE, R/O.UMAMAHESHWARAPURAM VILLAGE, MUNDLAMUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NAGARAJU NAGURU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO.29812 OF 2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “….to issue appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ Of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent calling the petitioner to register the lands in favour of the 5th respondent as arbitrary, illegal and violation of Article 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No.4 not to interfere in Civil Litigation pending OS No.144 of 2018 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Darsi and pass…” 2. Ms.A.Vasavi, learned counsel representing Sri Nagaraju Naguru, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Additional Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 03.01.2025. Pmk 5 29 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO:29812 of 2018 Date:03.01.2025 Pmk