SURENDRA SINGH S/O KOOM SINGH SHEKHAWAT v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/18118/2025 · 2025-11-25
Sandeep Taneja
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37170 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37170 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:47728] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18118/2025
1. Surendra Singh S/o Koom Singh Shekhawat, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Dhahar Ka Bas Sikar, (Rajasthan). Regis- tered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj52Ga6721.
2. Roop Singh S/o Prahlad Singh, R/o W. No Udawala Manoharpura Teh Sahpura Jaipur, Rajasthan. Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj52Ga6061.
3. M/s Govind Mines And Minerals, Registered Address- Joshi Oil Mill Amarsar Road Ajeetgarh Sikar, (Rajasthan) Through Proprietor Amit Kumar Pansari S/o Girdhari Lal Agarwal R/o Ward No 08 Opposite Bhati Mension Ki Gali Bajaj Road Sikar, (Rajasthan) Owner Of Vehicles Registra- tion No. Rj23Gb7472 And Rj23Gc2525.
4. M/s Gopinath Minchem Private Ltd, Registered Address- Joshi Oil Mill Amarsar Road Ajeetgarh Sikar, (Rajasthan) Through Proprietor Amit Kumar Pansari S/o Girdhari Lal Agarwal R/o Ward No 08 Opposite Bhati Mension Ki Gali Bajaj Road Sikar, (Rajasthan) Owner Of Vehicles Registra- tion No. Rj23Gb0713 And Rj52Ga6720.
5. M/s Shree Shyam Minerals And Grinding, Registered Ad- dress- Dhani New Khoti Dewan Shahpura Jaipur, (Ra- jasthan) Through Proprietor Sheesh Ram Jat S/o Banwari Lal R/o Village Goudawas Neem Ka Thana Sikar, (Ra- jasthan) Owner Of Vehicles Registration No. Rj52Gb8859 And Rj52Ga8859.
6. Bhanwar Lal Dudi S/o Padma Ram Dudi, R/o W N 12 Khariyan Ki Dhani Kitalsar Nagaur, (Rajasthan). Regis- tered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj52Ga1817.
7. Amit Gurjar S/o Radheshyam Gurjar, R/o Dhani Kalu Ki Mahawa Teh- Neem Ka Thana Sikar, (Rajasthan). Regis- tered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj23Gc4450. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Transport Department Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Secretary.
2. Department Of Mining And Geology, Government Of Ra- jasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary.
[2025:RJ-JP:47728] (2 of 3) [CW-18118/2025]
3. Commissioner, Transport Department, Government Of Ra- jasthan, Jaipur.
4. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Sikar, District Sikar. (Rajasthan).
5. District Transport Officer, Dto Office Kotputali, District Kotputali-Behror. (Rajasthan).
6. District Tansport Officer, Dto Office Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu. (Rajasthan).
7. District Transport Officer, Dto Office Shahpura, District Jaipur. (Rajasthan).
8. District Transport Officer, Dto Office Chomu, District Jaipur. (Rajasthan).
9. District Transport Officer, Dto Office Nagaur, District Na- gaur. ( Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surjeet Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra K. Takar, Adv for Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Order 25/11/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy involved in the present writ petition has already been decided by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.17894/2025 (Tofik Ahmed & ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors) decided on 20.11.2025.
2.
Learned counsel for the State does not refute the fact that similar controversy has been decided.
3. The co-ordinate Bench has decided the writ petition & opera- tive portion of the same is as follows:-
“6. Having heard the contentions made by the learned counsel for the parties, taking note of the material available on record in the petition, and the judgments
[2025:RJ-JP:47728] (3 of 3) [CW-18118/2025] cited at the Bar, this Court without going into the arena of disputed questions of facts and merits of the petition, is of a view that the impugned order, whereby the Registration Certificates of the vehicles owned / possessed by the petitioners are suspended, needs to be set aside, for the reasons that the said vehicles are the source of bread and butter of the petitioners and their families. However, the aforementioned revocation shall only be effective subject to a condition that the petitioners along with their counsel concerned shall re- port to / before the notice issuing authorities, on 05.12.2025, preferably in-between 11:00 am to 01:00 pm. Thereafter, due reply be filed within a period of 15 days.
7. Audience with respect to the same will be provided by competent authority on 20.12.2025. Adjudication of the same be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days.
8. It is made clear that during the period of considera- tion of grievances, the RCs of the vehicles owned/ possessed by the petitioners, which are suspended, shall be revoked and the status of the vehicle in furtherance to the consequential proceedings as regis- tered and entered upon the official portal concerned, shall be updated, without further ado.
9. It is made clear that no prejudice will be caused to either side on account of passing of the present order.
10. In the light of the same, the present writ petition
stands
disposed
of
with
the aforementioned directions being granted. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.”
4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is also disposed of in the same terms.
(SANDEEP TANEJA),J AVINASH GULERIA /44