Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3717 (UTT)

HASEEB v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/416/2025 · 2025-03-11

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No.416 of 2025 Haseeb ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Rangoli Purohit, Brief Holder for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No. 474 of 2024, under Sections 8/21/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Police Station Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. According to the FIR, 205 gram smack was recovered from the co-accused, who revealed that it is, in fact, the applicant, who had demanded smack from them. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the co-accused from whose possession smack was recovered has already been granted bail by this Court; there is no evidence against the applicant except the statement of the co-accused. 5. These facts are not denied by learned State counsel. 2 6. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 7. The bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Ravindra Maithani, J) 11.03.2025 Jitendra